I grew up in North Dakota, which some of you might remember from geography class. If you’re not from there, your functional knowledge of the 39th state[disputed] may be limited to the movie Fargo and, if you really paid attention in class, a vague connection with Teddy Roosevelt. (Brief aside: Fargo is actually a real place. It’s not a whole lot like the movie. Most of the people who sound like that are over 50.) It’s a lot different from Texas in that the temperature can get down to -50° in the winter. It’s a lot like Texas: it’s got a lot of flat, empty areas, the temperature often passes 100° in the summer, and there are some people who question whether it’s really a state, or something independent… Wait, what?
When I was in high school, I used to joke that North Dakota could probably secede from the Union and nobody would notice—it is the third least populous state, after all (ahead of Wyoming and Vermont). Last week, I found out that it was even worse than that—because of an oversight in the state’s constitution, one citizen of North Dakota claims that it technically isn’t even a state! The problem, he says, is that North Dakota’s state constitution doesn’t explicitly state that the executive branch requires an oath of office, which is at odds with the United States Constitution.
So what does this mean for North Dakota? Is it a state, just a territory, or another country altogether? Will you need a passport to travel there? Am I a natural born citizen of the United States, or do I need to apply for citizenship? Actually, it means very little. A different article of the Constitution says that Congress has the ultimate say in approving states, which they did for North Dakota in 1889, so that’s that. Essentially, it’s kind of like finding a typo—except that instead of just hitting “delete” and fixing it, it’ll take a vote next November to correct the problem. Then again, what’s one more year after 122?
| Jake Gauslow |
| Adult Services Librarian | |
| jgauslow@friscotexas.gov |




















